In a move that has sparked significant controversy, author J.K. Rowling has once again voiced her strong opinions on the inclusion of transgender athletes in women’s sports. This time, she has taken aim at two high-profile athletes—Imane Khelif and Valentina Petrillo—calling for new rules to be implemented in the upcoming Olympics to ensure fairness for cisgender women.

Rowling, known for her outspoken views on gender and women’s rights, has expressed concern over the participation of transgender athletes like Valentina Petrillo, an Italian Paralympian, and Imane Khelif, a rising boxing star. Both athletes have been at the center of heated debates regarding gender identity in sports, with critics arguing that their inclusion in women’s categories may create an uneven playing field.

In a recent interview, Rowling stated, “If it continues like this, it will be unfair to real women. The integrity of women’s sports is being compromised, and it’s time for organizations like the Olympics to step up and create rules that protect the essence of women’s competition.”

Rowling’s remarks come as the International Olympic Committee (IOC) prepares for next year’s Olympic Games, where the inclusion of transgender athletes remains a contentious issue. The IOC has implemented guidelines allowing transgender women to compete in women’s categories, provided they meet specific hormone level criteria. However, Rowling believes these rules do not go far enough to ensure fairness.

“Women’s sports were created to provide opportunities for female athletes to compete on a level playing field,” Rowling continued. “When we allow individuals who have lived most of their lives as men to compete against biological women, we undermine everything women have fought for in sports.”

She urged the IOC to consider stricter guidelines, such as creating separate categories for transgender athletes or further restricting hormone levels to ensure a more equitable competition.

Rowling’s comments have, as expected, sparked backlash from LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, who argue that excluding or segregating transgender athletes is discriminatory and harmful. Many of these groups have long campaigned for the inclusion of transgender individuals in all aspects of society, including sports, without facing undue scrutiny or exclusion.

In contrast, Rowling has also received support from individuals and organizations who share her concern about the potential advantages transgender athletes may have over their cisgender counterparts. Critics argue that while inclusion is important, the physical differences between cisgender women and transgender women—such as muscle mass and bone density—may create an imbalance that disadvantages female athletes.

Imane Khelif, an Algerian boxer, and Valentina Petrillo, a visually impaired Paralympic sprinter, have both been thrust into the spotlight in this ongoing debate. Khelif, who identifies as non-binary, has faced criticism from those who feel that their participation in women’s boxing raises questions about gender fairness. Petrillo, who transitioned in 2019, has been a trailblazer for transgender athletes, yet her success has been met with both admiration and skepticism.

Both athletes have defended their right to compete, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity in sports. Petrillo has stated that being able to compete as her true self is a fundamental right and that she has followed all the guidelines set by the IOC and other governing bodies.

As the debate intensifies, it is clear that the issue of transgender athletes in women’s sports is far from resolved. J.K. Rowling’s call for rule changes at the upcoming Olympics is likely to further stoke the flames of this already divisive issue.

As more athletes and public figures weigh in on the conversation, the future of women’s sports may hinge on how governing bodies like the IOC choose to address the growing concerns about fairness, inclusion, and the evolving definitions of gender in sports.

For now, Rowling’s voice remains one of the loudest in this ongoing debate, as she continues to advocate for what she believes is the protection of women’s sports. The question of whether new rules will be added remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: this conversation is far from over.