Novak Djokovic has shed light on his personal life while at the Davis Cup.

Novak Djokovic and his wife Jelena have been married since 2014 (Image: Getty)

Novak Djokovic has revealed that he and his wife, Jelena, argue about the mobile phone ban imposed on their two children. The high school sweethearts married in 2014 before welcoming Stefan, now nine years old, and seven-year-old Tara.

Djokovic followed his US Open third-round defeat by joining up with Team Serbia at the Davis Cup. Jelena and Tara were in the stands to watch the 37-year-old dispatch world No 770 Ioannis Xilas in just 45 minutes on Saturday, conceding only one game in the process.

Before that match, Djokovic was given the chance to open up on one part of his family life. “My children still don’t have a cell phone, my wife and I argue (about it),” Djokovic told Blic.

“The kids complain, ‘At school everyone has one except us’. It’s not easy and this is reflected on other levels as well. If everyone does something, the herd behaves like this, you have to follow them. Well, it doesn’t have to be like that. This is where I think we differ from others, because we are stubborn and active.”

Djokovic has already made it clear that he takes a more traditional approach to parenting. He explained the importance of keeping them active during this year’s Wimbledon Championships.

“Out of the two parents I am the one that is responsible for their activities, sports, healthy lifestyle,” he admitted in a studio interview with the Tennis Channel.

Novak Djokovic flew through his singles assignment at the Davis Cup (Image: Getty)

With Jelena standing nearby, he continued: “I want them… she is rolling her eyes right now as I am speaking (pointing to her and laughing). I keep on in a way reminding them how important it is to be active, just do sports.

“I mean whether it is tennis or whatever it is, just be active, be out there. So I try to take them on with me on tennis every day, even if it’s the match day I want them to be here with me.”

Meghan Markle looks sleek in £30,937 worth of clothes and jewellery at LA charity tennis tournament before Prince Harry’s 40th birthday

Meghan Markle donned an effortlessly elegant ensemble worth £30,937 as she attended the George Zajfen Tennis Tournament in Los Angeles on Saturday.

The Duchess of Sussex, 43, opted for a sophisticated look in a tailored, sleeveless halter-neck ‘Edda’ dress from luxury Italian brand Giuliva Heritage, priced at £‌1,050.

The timeless piece, made from sustainable cotton and wool blend, took six hours of ‘pure craftmanship’ to create, according to the brand’s website.

The mother-of-two teamed the dress with her £725 brown satchel handbag from Caroline Herrera and a pair of matching £620 heels from one of her favourite brands, Aquazzura.

She accessorised the look with a pair of classic £92 Ray-Ban aviator sunglasses and her staple jewellery pieces, including her £21,400 Cartier gold tank Française watch and a £7,050 ‘Love’ yellow gold bracelet from the same brand.

Meghan styled her raven tresses back in loose curls and opted for a summery, dewy make-up look which showed off her California tan.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex appeared at the George Zajfen Tennis Tournament in honour of Kelly McKee Zajfen’s late son George.

The event for the Alliance for Children’s Rights was in remembrance of George, who died aged just nine in July 2022 after being found unresponsive in their family home.

Meghan is known to be good friends with Zajfen, co-founder of the alliance which supports pregnant and parenting teenagers in the foster care system in Los Angeles.

In an Instagram post on Prince Harry’s birthday – the day after the tennis match – model Zajfen and her family thanked the Sussexes for their support at the competition on Saturday.

Alongside five photos, they wrote at the end of a long message: ‘Extra special day too…HAPPY 40th Birthday H! May this trip around the sun be the best yet.’

Other stars in attendance at the tournament included Property Brothers star Jonathan Scott, New Girl actress Zooey Deschanel, Scrubs actor Zach Braff and Meghan’s friend and former Suits colleague Abigail Spencer, reported People.

The pictures in the post showed the Duke and Duchess posing with the Zajfen family — with Harry wearing a T-shirt and blazer, and Meghan wearing a ivory dress.

The Zajfen family wrote that it was an ‘incredible day – full of emotions and lots of love’ and the funds raised would ‘go directly to supporting children in foster care, ensuring they have the legal protections, resources and opportunities they deserve in honour of our beautiful son Georgie’.

Their post continued: ‘Our community showed up in a big way and I’m in awe! Get ready for days of posting images of this magical afternoon because I have so many people to thank and shout from the roof tops just how amazing you all are!

‘But first, to our presenting sponsors, the Archewell Foundation. Harry and Meghan, you have been such a guiding light for our family not just in the way you have shown up in friendship but how you have shown up through the incredible work the Archewell Foundation does every day.

‘I’m in awe of your commitment to community and to friendship. On behalf of the Alliance for Children’s Rights, we thank you. On behalf of our family, we love you.’

The tournament, which has been held for 20 years but was recently renamed in honour of George, featured a round-robin doubles competition and a lunch.

The Duchess has supported Zajfen through grief since George died – and Zajfen has previously described Meghan as an ‘incredible friend and mother’, adding that she is ‘always the first to say yes and support those you love’.

Harry, who lives in California after stepping down from the working monarchy, spent his birthday on Sunday with Meghan and their children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.

He is then said to be heading away for a gathering with close friends.

It comes as Prince William and Kate wished Harry a happy 40th birthday in a message on social media.

The Prince and Princess of Wales shared an earlier post from the Royal Family on X and added their own message, which read: ‘Wishing a Happy 40th Birthday to The Duke of Sussex!’

Some will see the post as a surprise move given the unresolved tensions between the brothers. Their estrangement has shown no sign of abating, with the duke also having a strained relationship with his father, the King.

A post from the Royal Family account earlier yesterday marked the first public birthday message for Harry since 2021. A post shared on X said simply: ‘Wishing The Duke of Sussex a very happy 40th birthday today!’

The message was also accompanied by a picture of a smiling Harry and an emoji of a birthday cake.

The picture chosen of Harry – taken when he was a working royal in 2018 – was shot during a visit to a start-up in Dublin with Meghan next to him, but she was cropped out.

Harry enters his 40th year in what has been a rollercoaster 365 days for the royal family, with both the King and the Princess of Wales being diagnosed with cancer.

When the King’s shock health news was announced in February, Harry made a transatlantic dash to see him but his meeting with his father was kept to just 45 minutes.

In comments released to the BBC, the duke said ‘I was anxious about 30, I’m excited about 40’, and described how fatherhood had given him a renewed sense of purpose to make ‘this world a better place’.

Harry’s year has seen him try his hand at the skeleton bobsled when he joined Invictus Games competitors training in Canada, and undertake quasi-royal tours to Colombia and Nigeria.

In Colombia, Meghan addressed a panel on Afro-Descendant Women and Power and told how her three-year-old daughter Lili had ‘absolutely found her voice’.

The couple also relaunched their Archewell website, rebranding it as Sussex.com under the title The Office of Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

Harry travelled to London in May to celebrate a decade of his Invictus Games and attended a service at St Paul’s Cathedral, but did not meet his brother or father.

Birmingham has won the bid to host the sporting competition in 2027, with the duke congratulating the city on its success and looking set to attend the games in the UK in three years’ time.

In July, Harry received the Pat Tillman Award for Service, awarded by sports channel ESPN to individuals in the sporting world, for using his platform to ‘change the world’.

But Tillman’s mother Mary reportedly expressed her shock that the honour was given to ‘such a controversial and divisive individual’.

In his speech, Harry praised Mrs Tillman, saying: ‘Her advocacy for Pat’s legacy is deeply personal and one that I respect. The bond between a mother and son is eternal and transcends even the greatest losses.’

Meanwhile, The Sunday Times reported that his legal battle with the Home Office over his security while in the UK had ‘frustrated’ the King.

Harry lost a High Court challenge against the Home Office in February over a decision to change the level of his personal security when he visits the UK, but he has been given the green light to appeal.

During the case, the court was told Harry believes his children cannot ‘feel at home’ in the UK if it is ‘not possible to keep them safe’ there and that he faces a greater risk than his late mother, with ‘additional layers of racism and extremism’.

Elsewhere, Meghan started a new venture with the soft launch of her brand American Riviera Orchard when she sent limited edition strawberry jam to her friends – although the business has faced setbacks with its attempts at trademarking.

Harry’s new Netflix documentary series about the world of polo is set to air in December.

There was a brief return to the UK for the duke in August for the funeral of his uncle Lord Fellowes, when he stayed at Althorp, the ancestral home of his late mother Diana, Princess of Wales.

He reportedly had no interaction with William at the church service.

The duke has an upcoming trip to New York later this month, where he will carry out visits for his Archewell Foundation, and engagements with African Parks, The Halo Trust, The Diana Award, and Travalyst.

In the world of WNBA basketball, where drama is never in short supply, Caitlin Clark found herself embroiled in the latest officiating fiasco during the Indiana Fever’s nail-biting clash with the Dallas Wings. But this time, it wasn’t Clark’s gravity-defying jump shot or dazzling court vision that had fans talking—it was a foul call so questionable it could make a conspiracy theorist blush.

Late in the first half, with the game intensity ramping up like your heartbeat before a last-second buzzer-beater, Clark sliced through the defense like a hot knife through butter. Only, instead of earning a foul for the rough Dallas defense, Clark herself was slapped with an offensive foul after a physical collision that left her sprawled on the hardwood. Cue the collective gasp from Fever fans, who were left wondering if they were watching basketball or some bizarre officiating experiment gone wrong.

“Wait, did they just call that on her?” was the sentiment echoed across social media. Fans couldn’t believe it, and frankly, neither could Clark, who looked as if she was trying to solve a Rubik’s cube while doing calculus in her head. The disbelief on her face said it all—this was no ordinary call. It was a “phantom foul,” the kind that makes you question whether the referees have been secretly binge-watching blindfolded basketball tutorials.

Not one to shy away from expressing her frustrations (who could forget her six technical fouls this season?), Clark’s exasperation nearly earned her another technical. Imagine the headlines if that had happened: “Clark Suspended Before Playoffs for Having Too Much Common Sense.” Fortunately, teammates Aliyah Boston and Erica Wheeler swooped in to save the day, cooling Clark off like a couple of firefighters putting out a social media wildfire.

But the real heat came from the fans, who were ready to serve up a scathing roast of the referees. Twitter was ablaze with reactions ranging from bewilderment to outright comedy. One fan tweeted, “These refs are consistently horrible. Are they even aware of the rules, or is this just a practice run for them?” Another chimed in with, “At this point, I think I’ve seen better officiating at a high school dodgeball game.”

And honestly, they weren’t wrong. As the Fever gear up for their first postseason run in eight years, the stakes are higher than Clark’s three-point shooting percentage. The last thing this team needs is to be derailed by questionable officiating that has the potential to turn playoff dreams into nightmares. One more technical foul for Clark, and she could find herself sidelined at a time when the Fever need her most.

Fever fans, already biting their nails in anticipation of the playoffs, are now biting their tongues to keep from screaming at their TV screens. The hope is that the league takes a long, hard look at its officiating—preferably before it ruins someone’s postseason with another whistle that leaves us all scratching our heads.

As for Clark, she’s taking it in stride, knowing that her game does the real talking. But if the refs keep this up, the only thing hotter than the Fever’s playoff push might be the fan outrage. One thing’s for sure: the WNBA has some explaining to do, and fans will be watching the next game with more scrutiny than ever.

Will the refs redeem themselves, or will they once again find themselves on the receiving end of a Twitter roast? Stay tuned—because in the world of WNBA basketball, anything can happen, especially when the officials are involved!

In the world of sports hot takes, it seems Caitlin Clark can’t escape the crossfire—this time coming from none other than the ever-controversial sports commentator, Jason Whitlock. Clark, the Indiana Fever’s rising star, has been accused of doing something many athletes in high-pressure leagues do: voicing her opinion (often, and loudly). Apparently, that’s enough for Whitlock to compare her to LeBron James. Yes, you read that right.

The 22-year-old sensation, averaging an impressive 19.5 points per game, 5.7 assists, and 8.4 rebounds in her rookie WNBA season, has been putting on a show that Fever fans can’t get enough of. But Whitlock, never one to let statistics or common sense get in the way of a spicy take, jumped on X (formerly Twitter) to make sure his followers knew just how fed up he is with Clark’s alleged antics.

“It’s official. Caitlin Clark is LeBron James,” he posted dramatically, as if we didn’t just witness LeBron and his four NBA titles. He continued: “She just laid a defender out with a Derrick Henry stiff-arm and the refs didn’t even consider blowing a whistle.” To top it off, Whitlock sealed his rant with a kicker: “Plus she whines way too much. I can’t take it.”

Wait, what? Derrick Henry? Really? Does anyone else feel like we’re comparing apples to rocket ships here?

Now, to be fair, Clark did have a little run-in with Dallas Wings’ Jacy Sheldon during the Fever’s recent win, where she might’ve used her elbow to clear some space. But hey, in the heat of battle, elbows tend to find their way into places they shouldn’t. A foul call? Maybe. But a full-blown comparison to Derrick Henry trucking defenders in the NFL? That’s a leap only Whitlock could take.

Sure, Clark’s fiery demeanor has landed her six technical fouls this season—just one short of a suspension—but she’s hardly begging for superstar treatment like Whitlock implies. She even addressed the possibility of a tech with a laugh, saying, “Well, I didn’t think they were gonna give me a technical at any point tonight,” after their win over the Wings. If you ask us, that’s more like playing it cool, not being “too entitled.”

But let’s dig into what might really be irking Whitlock. It seems his heart lies elsewhere: “Kelsey Mitchell is my fav player,” he tweeted. Ah, now we get it! The man’s been Clark-snatched from his first love—Kelsey Mitchell, Clark’s teammate who’s been overshadowed by the rookie’s meteoric rise. Maybe this is less about Clark’s alleged whining and more about a sports crush gone sour?

Regardless, Clark’s critics might want to take a deep breath before casting too many stones. With Rookie of the Year and possibly even MVP honors on the horizon, she’s just getting started. And let’s not forget, she’s the one helping the Fever float a .513 record, far from the bottom-dwelling Washington Mystics, whom the Fever face next.

Speaking of the Mystics, Thursday’s game will be pivotal for both teams. Rooted at the bottom of the Eastern Conference, the Mystics are desperate to save face. Meanwhile, Clark will be there, most likely racking up more points and—if we’re lucky—a few more complaints to keep the narrative alive.

If Whitlock and his complaints about complaints sound a bit like déjà vu, it’s because they are. LeBron has heard it all before. And now, apparently, so has Caitlin Clark.

So the next time Jason Whitlock decides to weigh in, maybe he should consider that, like LeBron, Clark’s going to keep talking—because talking, and playing, are two things she does better than most.

In a world where viral TikTok challenges tend to showcase clumsy dance moves or cringe-worthy childhood memories, Caitlin Clark just took things to a whole new level—and no, it wasn’t with an air ball. The WNBA star, known for making basketball look as easy as tying her shoes, showed the world that her destiny was sealed long before she could even spell “WNBA.”

The challenge was simple: share an embarrassing childhood photo and let the internet have a good laugh at your expense. And while most athletes would play along, chuckling at their awkward middle school phases, Clark did something unexpected. Handed a picture of her younger self—likely around six years old, holding a basketball like it was the Holy Grail—Clark didn’t flinch or laugh. Nope, she got emotional. Cue the heartstrings, folks.

TikTok Challenge? More Like a Destiny Unlocked

Instead of delivering a side-eye or cracking a joke, Clark’s eyes sparkled with nostalgia. That little girl in the photo? She wasn’t just posing for the family album; she was already locking in her hoop dreams. This wasn’t just some awkward toddler snap; it was a foreshadowing. If you zoomed in on that determined 6-year-old’s face, you could practically hear her thinking, “I’m going to break records someday, y’all just wait.”

A Basketball in Hand, a Dream in Her Heart

While other kids were probably busy sticking action figures up their noses, baby Caitlin was busy clutching that basketball like it was her ticket to the big leagues—and spoiler alert, it was. From backyard dribbling to no-look passes, the young prodigy had already fallen head over heels for the sport. Forget dolls and playhouses, Caitlin was all about those hoops.

Let’s face it: not many of us look back at childhood photos and think, “Yup, I knew I was going to be a big deal.” For most of us, those pictures serve as blackmail material for family reunions. But not Clark. This viral moment wasn’t just a nostalgia trip; it was proof that she’s been hustling for greatness since the days of juice boxes and recess.

From Kiddie Court to WNBA Queen

Fast forward a couple of decades, and Clark is now one of the most electrifying players in the WNBA—dishing out dimes, draining three-pointers from downtown, and breaking ankles like it’s just another Tuesday. That six-year-old girl? She grew up, put in the work, and is now giving defenders nightmares. If basketball was a Marvel movie, Clark would be the superhero, and her superpower would be making the impossible look effortless.

And while the TikTok challenge might have been designed to make us laugh at athletes’ goofy childhood selves, Caitlin Clark flipped the script. Instead of humor, she gave us a glimpse into the soul of an athlete who knew from the start that she was born to ball.

From Viral to Vital

It’s not every day a TikTok challenge goes viral and inspires goosebumps, but leave it to Caitlin Clark to raise the stakes. This moment isn’t just about a cute photo; it’s a reminder that sometimes, the dreams we chase as kids really do come true. For Clark, basketball wasn’t just a phase—it was always part of the plan.

So the next time you scroll through your own childhood photos, don’t just cringe—maybe, just maybe, your awkward past holds the key to your epic future. But if your destiny involves basketball, you might have some serious competition, because Caitlin Clark got there first. And let’s be real: she’s already lightyears ahead, spinning her way to glory.

Conclusion: A Shot Called Early

In the end, this viral moment doesn’t just remind us of Caitlin Clark’s talent—it cements her status as someone whose journey to basketball greatness was practically written in the stars. That little girl with the ball? She wasn’t just dreaming; she was planning. And now, we’re all just watching her execute it with the kind of precision that makes even the wildest shots look easy.

Clark’s story proves that sometimes, the game we fall in love with as kids really can shape our future—and for her, it’s safe to say the future looks pretty darn spectacular.

So yeah, TikTok, thanks for reminding us that even in a world full of challenges, the real winners are the ones who’ve been planning their victory since day one.

The basketball star ignited furious backlash from her conservative fans after she liked Taylor Swift’s Instagram post endorsing Kamala Harris—and when a reporter asked why she did it, she gave a very measured answer.

@cbrennansports/X, Noam Galai/Getty Images for MTV

WNBA star Caitlin Clark was lauded for her calculated response to a question regarding the backlash for “liking” Taylor Swift’s post announcing the singer was officially endorsing Democratic nominee Kamala Harris and her running mate Tim Walz.

After Harris dominated Republican challenger Donald Trump for her first presidential debate against him on Tuesday, the long-awaited endorsement finally came from Swift, the biggest international music star who is continuously playing to sold-out arenas with her ongoing Eras Tour.

The “Fortnight” singer posted a four-paragraph message to fans praising Harris and Walz and encouraging her millions of followers on social media to do their “own research, ” register and vote. Her anticipated announcement led to at over 400,000 visits in just 24 hours to the voter information website via a link she included.

Clark was among the many celebrities—including actors Reese Witherspoon and Viola Davis, music artists Sabrina Carpenter and Charli XCX, and even Oprah—who smashed the “like” button on Swift’s post in which she signed off and included a photo of herself as a “Childless Cat Lady,” a jab at Trump’s VP pick JD Vance’s demeaning comment towards women voters.

@ladynoirdeluoirdelu/X

But it was Clark who incurred significant backlash from the disgruntled MAGA contingent for getting involved in aligning with Democrats.

Disappointed former fans withdrew support for the Indiana Fever basketball player after seeing her approval of Swift’s blue ticket endorsement.

Here are some of the hateful comments Clark saw flooding her Instagram messages, screenshot by X user @KevinOnStage.

@KevinOnStage/X

@KevinOnStage

@KevinOnStage

@KevinOnStage

@KevinOnStage

@KevinOnStage

Amidst the controversy surrounding Clark, USA Today columnist Christine Brennan asked Clark to explain what Swift’s post meant to her and if she would “potentially vote for Kamala Harris.”

Clark replied at Wednesday’s press conference:

“I have this amazing platform, so I think the biggest thing would be to just encourage people to register to vote.”

The 22-year-old continued:

“That’s the biggest thing I can do with the platform that I have, and that’s the same thing Taylor did. And I think you continue to educate yourself about the candidates that we have and the policies they are supporting.”

Clark reiterated the importance of voter privilege and added:

“That’s the biggest thing you can do, and that’s what I would recommend to every person who has that opportunity in our country.”

 

In her Harris/Walz endorsement, Swift wrote in part:

“I’m voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them. I think she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos.”

“I was so heartened and impressed by her selection of running mate @timwalz, who has been standing up for LGBTQ+ rights, IVF, and a woman’s right to her own body for decades.”

“I’ve done my research, and I’ve made my choice. Your research is all yours to do, and the choice is yours to make,” she said before reminding first-time voters they have to be registered first in order to vote.

Swift previously endorsed Democratic President Joe Biden and VP Harris in 2020 after expressing regret for not endorsing Trump’s Democratic challenger, former U.S. Senator, Secretary of State and First Lady Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.

In a startling development, the WNBA has initiated a thorough investigation into alleged referee misconduct during games involving prominent player Caitlin Clark. The inquiry centers around claims that referees failed to address and penalize opposing players for what have been described as “dirty actions” against Clark.

The controversy has gained significant traction following several high-profile incidents where Clark, known for her exceptional skills and competitive spirit, purportedly faced undue physicality and fouls that went unnoticed or unpunished. The WNBA, keenly aware of the potential implications on player safety and fair play, has taken decisive action by suspending certain referees pending the outcome of the investigation.

This move by the WNBA underscores its commitment to upholding the integrity of the game and ensuring the protection of its players. Caitlin Clark, a rising star whose performances have captured the attention of fans and analysts alike, has been at the center of discussions regarding player safety and officiating standards in the league.

Fans and stakeholders are eagerly awaiting the results of the investigation, which promises to shed light on the circumstances surrounding these contentious games. The league’s proactive stance in addressing these issues reflects its dedication to maintaining a competitive and respectful environment for all athletes.

As the investigation unfolds, the WNBA continues to emphasize its dedication to fair play and accountability within its officiating ranks. The outcomes of this inquiry are anticipated to have far-reaching implications for the league’s policies and procedures moving forward.

Taylor Swift, shown here at the 2024 MTV Video Music Awards, has become the subject of Donald Trump’s ire after she endorsed Kamala Harris

An organization of Taylor Swift fans said Monday they raised more than $40,000 for the Kamala Harris campaign following Donald Trump’s post that he hates the pop megastar.

The Republican hopeful fired a Sunday morning missive on Truth Social saying “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!”, which the “Swifties for Kamala” organization capitalized on to raise money for his Democratic rival.

“As soon as we saw the post, we knew this was an opportunity. Our team was ready to go with lyric response ideas and ways to tie in our calls to donate and volunteer,” said Carly Long, a member of the group’s communications team, in a statement.

“We use the memes to catch people’s attention, and then tell them how to turn that emotion into action. Swifties know that haters gonna hate, but we also know we can do more than just shake, shake, shake.”

The superfans stumping for Kamala Harris are not formally affiliated with the artist who unites them.

They say they’ve now raised more than $207,000 since kicking off their fundraising and outreach efforts less than two months ago.

A few weeks ago they held an inaugural fundraising call that was joined by 27,000 viewers, and featured appearances from stars like Carole King along with Senators Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand and Ed Markey.

Since then Swift herself has endorsed Harris and her running mate Tim Walz over Donald Trump, calling the Democrat and current vice president a “steady-handed, gifted leader.”

“I’m voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them,” Swift posted in the minutes following the Harris-Trump debate last week.

In addition to fundraising and phone banking, the Swifties For Kamala outfit says they are planning additional outreach efforts particularly in swing states and at remaining dates of the blockbuster Eras Tour, which is currently on break.

It’s scheduled to pick back up in Miami on October 18.

Irene Kim, a Swifties For Kamala cofounder, said in a statement that the group is “proof of the power Swifties have.”

“We’re building off our existing fandom culture to make voting and politics accessible.”

Timberlake to push papers in community service plea deal for pop star

Don’t expect to see Justin Timberlake scooping up trash along the Long Island Expressway any time soon.

Instead, the pop icon will be performing his 25 hours of court-ordered community service within the confines of the cozy court system itself after taking a plea deal in his Hamptons drunk-driving arrest Friday, The Post has learned.

But a source close to the singer’s defense team said forget about the “Suit and Tie” star cleaning courthouse toilets or mopping jury room floors.

Justin Timberlake accepted a plea deal on Friday.Brigitte Stelzer
“He would be doing stuff like sorting documents [for the court clerk], organizing files,” said the source.

Timberlake, 43, even has final say over where he’ll do his hours, the source said — noting it would likely be in New York, California or his home state of Tennessee.

The “SexyBack” crooner was eager to strike a deal, the source added, ahead of his upcoming Canadian tour dates next month.

“With a felony conviction on his record, Canada wouldn’t have let him in,” the source explained. “He wouldn’t be allowed into a lot of other countries, too, but he makes big money in Canada.”

Prosecutors had little evidence to prove their case, which a source described as “weak.”Brigitte Stelzer
Calling it “a weak case,” the source said local prosecutors were also interested in pursuing a plea.

“There was no blood evidence, and he refused the Breathalyzer,” said the source.

The prosecution didn’t want to rely on “observational testimony” from “a rookie cop who didn’t even know who the guy was,” the source insisted.

Timberlake at the Sag Harbor Village Justice Court at 55 Main Street in Sag Harbor, NY.Brigitte Stelzer
Timberlake appeared in Sag Harbor Village Court Friday, and pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of driving while alcohol impaired instead of the more serious charge of driving while intoxicated, a felony.

He was also ordered to pay a small fine and author a public service announcement.

Timberlake’s 2025 BMW was pulled over in the early hours of June 18 after Sag Harbor police alleged he blew a stop sign and was swerving out of his lane. He then refused three times to take a breathalyzer test, police allege.

6
Timberlake addressed a crush of media following Friday’s court appearance.Brigitte Stelzer

Justin Timberlake and his Lawyer Ed Burke jr. at the Sag Harbor Village Justice Court at 55 Main Street in Sag Harbor, NY.Brigitte Stelzer
On the night of his arrest, Timberlake was warned earlier not to drive by the officer who later stopped him, The Post previously reported.

Timberlake told the arresting officer he’d had one martini at the American Hotel before heading for his car. The bartender working that night corroborated the singer’s claim to investigators, the source said.

The singer also famously told the cop that the incident would “ruin the tour.”

Timberlake’s lawyer couldn’t be reached for comment. Prosecutors were also unavailable.

Timberlake has had issues with alcohol for years, sources had told Page Six, and that he’s largely enabled by the people surrounding him.

Timberlake smiles after entering court Friday.T E MCMORROW/POOL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
“It’s a real thing, and when you have a drinking problem, it’s apparent, yet they’ve pushed this tour on him, and he’s been in a very dark place,” the source said.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMKEqlhOURA

Chelsea Clinton discusses her new documentary co-produced with her mom Hillary Clinton, ‘Zurawski V. Texas,’ about three Texas women who were denied medically necessary abortion care

**A Spotlight on Reproductive Rights and Women’s Health: Chelsea Clinton’s Latest Documentary and the Broader Issue**

Chelsea Clinton and her mother, Hillary Clinton, have recently produced a thought-provoking documentary titled *Zurawski v. Texas*, which delves into the deeply personal and medical consequences of abortion bans in Texas. During an appearance on *The View*, Chelsea discussed the project and its significance, highlighting the urgent need for broader public understanding of what abortion restrictions truly mean for women, their families, and society at large.

The documentary follows three women whose lives were dramatically impacted by the denial of medically necessary abortion care due to restrictive laws in Texas. These women, despite needing abortions to protect their health and well-being, were barred from accessing the care they required. The emotional and physical trauma they endured is a central theme in the documentary, which aims to bring to light the personal stories that often get lost in the larger political and legal debates surrounding abortion rights.

**The Reality of Abortion Bans**

Chelsea Clinton emphasized that the case these women brought against the state of Texas, *Zurawski v. Texas*, is more than just a legal battle; it’s a fight to protect women’s health. While these women ultimately lost their case a few months ago, they continue to share their experiences in an effort to raise awareness and prevent others from going through similar suffering.

Clinton’s comments underscored that abortion is not just a political or ideological issue. For the women denied care, it is a deeply personal one that directly impacts their physical health, emotional well-being, and the stability of their families. The documentary seeks to shift the conversation back to this human aspect, making the case that abortion rights should be viewed not only through a legal and political lens but also as a vital healthcare issue.

Throughout the conversation, Clinton reminded viewers that historically, even within the pro-life movement, there were always exceptions made for cases involving the health or life of the mother, as well as for instances of rape and incest. However, recent developments in many states, like Texas, have seen these exceptions disappear, further endangering the lives of women and making access to healthcare even more complicated and perilous.

**A Broader Conversation about Women’s Health**

Co-host Whoopi Goldberg expanded on the discussion by pointing out that the battle over abortion rights is not simply about the procedure itself, but about women’s health more broadly. Goldberg stressed that many aspects of women’s healthcare are intertwined with reproductive rights, and when access to abortion is restricted, it often means that other areas of women’s health are similarly compromised. This is something that those outside the reproductive rights movement may not fully realize.

Abortion rights, Goldberg argued, are part of a larger discussion about healthcare. She noted that the move to restrict abortion access didn’t happen spontaneously—it was the result of a long and concerted effort by political and ideological groups. Now, many people are only just beginning to see the far-reaching effects of these changes, particularly in states like Texas, where the laws are some of the most restrictive in the country.

**The Impact of *Zurawski v. Texas***

Chelsea Clinton and her mother debuted their documentary at the Telluride Film Festival and plan to showcase it at additional festivals in hopes of securing broader distribution. The goal is to make these stories widely accessible so that the public can understand the true impact of these restrictive laws. The documentary presents a sobering look at the real-world consequences of the abortion bans, shining a light on the pain and suffering endured by women and their families as a result of these policies.

In reflecting on the documentary’s message, Clinton reiterated that the current state of abortion rights in places like Texas does not reflect the shared values that have historically guided American conversations on this topic. The lack of exceptions for the health of the mother, or in cases of rape and incest, shows how far the conversation has drifted from what most people would consider humane and reasonable. For Clinton, the documentary serves as a reminder that these stories of personal trauma and loss need to be central to the conversation if there is to be any hope of returning to a place where women’s healthcare is protected.

**A Call to Action**

The discussion on *The View* made it clear that reproductive rights, including access to abortion, are not just legal or political issues—they are deeply personal and critically important to women’s health. Chelsea Clinton’s documentary aims to humanize this issue by sharing the stories of real women who have suffered due to restrictive abortion laws. The hope is that by focusing on these personal narratives, the conversation around abortion can shift away from partisan rhetoric and towards a more compassionate, health-centered approach.

In sum, the conversation and the documentary alike call for a renewed focus on women’s health and reproductive rights. The loss of the *Zurawski v. Texas* case may have been a setback, but the fight continues, driven by the courage of women willing to share their stories and by the work of advocates like Chelsea and Hillary Clinton, who are determined to make sure these stories are heard.